Legal Opinion

United States v. Herrington

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided March 29, 1976No. CM 432012PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

DeFORD, Judge:

At a trial by general court-martial, the appellant pleaded guilty to robbery and conspiracy to commit robbery and not guilty to attempted murder, rape and conspiracy to commit rape in violation of Articles 80, 81, 120 and 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. §§ 880, 881, 920 and 922). He was found to be guilty of aggravated assault, rape, conspiracy to commit robbery, and robbery in violation of Articles 128, 120, 81 and 122, Uniform Code of Military Justice (10 U.S.C. §§ 928, 920, 881 and 922), and received the approved sentence set forth above.

*809Th…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. BurtonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1971
  2. United States v. DoctorUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
  3. United States v. TibbsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1965
  4. United States v. NelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. HounshellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. GrayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  2. United States v. RowseyUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. CarrollU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  4. United States v. WallaceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
  5. United States v. ZammitU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API