Legal Opinion

United States v. Carroll

U.S. Army Court of Military Review

Decided February 25, 1992No. ACMR 9001835PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

JOHNSON, Senior Judge:

Contrary to his pleas, the appellant was convicted by a general court-martial consisting of officer members of rape in violation of Article 120, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 920 (1982) [hereinafter UCMJ]. The convening authority approved the adjudged sentence of a dishonorable discharge, confinement for fifteen years, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and reduction to Private El.

The appellant asserts that the trial counsel’s reference, during argument on sentence, to the appellant’s lack of remorse over the offense and his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. GrostefonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  2. United States v. FisherUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  3. United States v. CliftonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1983
  4. United States v. NelsonUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
  5. United States v. McPhaulU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States v. EdwardsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  2. United States v. GrayU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. ThompsonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993
  4. United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  5. United States v. EdmondsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API