United States v. Burton
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
Darden, Chief Judge:
The Court granted two issues resulting from a general court-martial conviction of Specialist Four Burton for two assaults and violation of a general regulation.
We address first the contention that the pleas of guilty were improvident. The foundation for this contention is that in informing Specialist Burton of the rights his guilty plea waived, the military judge failed to comply with this Court’s decision in United States v Care, 18 USCMA 535, 40 CMR 247 (1969). The Care opinion declares:
“Further, the record must also demonstrate the military trial…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. CareUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Williams v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- United States v. HounshellUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1956
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by306 opinions
- United States v. TardifCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2002
- William L. Calley, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, Etc., Etc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Dettinger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1979
- United States v. PalmiterUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1985
- United States v. KossmanUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
301 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.