United States v. Wallace
U.S. Army Court of Military Review
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON FURTHER REVIEW
JONES, Senior Judge:
This case is again before this Court for review pursuant to Article 66, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 866. Previously, we directed a new review and action by a different staff judge advocate and convening authority because the original authorities were disqualified from acting. United States v. Sierra-Albino, 23 U.S. C.M.A. 63, 48 C.M.R. 534 (1974).
The question now before us is whether the new defense counsel appointed by the new convening authority was “counsel for the accused” as that term is used in United States v. Goode, 23…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. GoodeUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1975
- United States v. BatesU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. IversonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1975
- United States v. MillerU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1976
- United States v. EconomuU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1976
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. JonesU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. CrawleyU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1977
- United States v. EdwardsU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. KirklandU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1978
- United States v. PriceU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.