Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. Schultz Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 18, 1954No. Civ. 14748PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

This action was brought by the state, through its Department of Public Works, to condemn the front 96 feet of a tract of land having a 300-foot frontage owned by the Schultz Company. The land abuts Highway 101 in Marin County and was condemned as part of a plan to convert the highway into a freeway, with certain outer highways as feeders. The jury fixed the value of the condemned parcel at $5,700, and found that there were no sev erance damages or special benefits to the nncondemned parcel. The trial court ordered the parcel in question condemned, including any abutter’s or access rights…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. RicciardiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Eachus v. Los Angeles Consolidated Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Sacramento Etc. R.R. Co. v. HeilbronCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  5. Long Beach City High School District v. StewartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Margaret Kinzli Evelyn Goossen Philip Kinzli Ernest Kinzli, Plaintiffs v. City of Santa CruzCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
  2. People v. AyonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
  3. People v. ChevalierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. ClevengerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1956
  5. People Ex Rel. Department of Public Works v. SilveiraCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API