Legal Opinion

Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. P. & D. MFG. CO.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided February 13, 1940No. 170PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Per curiam

We decided these appeals in 1935 (2 Cir., 78 F.2d 700) but granted a rehearing because of the disqualification of one member of the original court, not known at the time. The case is in two parts: unfair competition, and patent infringement. As to the first, we need add nothing to what we said before; it is difficult to imagine a more open attempt to secure the monopoly of an industry without the aid of a patent. There is nothing unlawful in copying the unpatented products of another dealer down to the last detail, except in so far as the resulting similarity may become a means of securing…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Crescent Tool Co. v. Kilborn & Bishop Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  2. Wilson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  3. Cheney Bros. v. Doris Silk CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1929
  4. Heyer v. Duplicator Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. Electric Auto-Lite Co. v. P. & D. MFG. CO.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. West Point Manufacturing Company v. Detroit Stamping CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1955
  2. Chas. D. Briddell, Inc. v. Alglobe Trading Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  3. Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1956
  4. General Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
  5. Everpure, Inc. v. Cuno, Inc., Defendant/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API