West Point Manufacturing Company v. Detroit Stamping Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
McALLISTER, Circuit Judge.
Upon the expiration of appellee’s patent for a toggle clamp, a device for clamping parts in industrial production, appellant copied a number of appellee’s clamps and prepared to advertise, manufacture, and sell them to the industry with its own trade-mark affixed in place of appellee’s trade-mark.
To forestall such action, appellee filed a complaint, claiming that, although the patent had expired, appellant, under the Lanham Trade-Mark Act of 1946, 15 U.S. C.A. § 1051 et seq., was guilty of unfair competition in copying and manufacturing such clamps, and asked that…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Kellogg Co. v. National Biscuit Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Singer Manufacturing Co. v. June Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Howe Scale Co. v. Wyckoff, Seamans & BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Scott Paper Co. v. Marcalus Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1945
- G. & C. Merriam Co. v. SaalfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1912
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Boston Professional Hockey Association, Inc. v. Dallas Cap & Emblem Mfg., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Am General Corporation and General Motors Corporation v. Daimlerchrysler CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Herman Miller, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Palazzetti Imports and Exports, Inc., Defendant-Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Pebble Beach Co. v. Tour 18 I Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Truck Equipment Service Company, Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Fruehauf Corporation, Appellee-Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.