Legal Opinion
Chas. D. Briddell, Inc. v. Alglobe Trading Corp.
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided January 21, 1952No. 22217_1PublishedCited by 59 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK, Circuit Judge.
From our examination of the knives and containers, and the other exhibits, we think there is, to say the least, considerable doubt whether, on this record, there was marked creativeness in the appearance of plaintiff’s knives (made in the well-known form of a hunting knife) or of the containers, or in putting such knives in such containers-. But we shall assume, arguendo, that the plaintiff’s design was unquestionably unique and the result of genius. Even on that assumption, we think that, without more, plaintiff was not entitled to a preliminary injunction. Our reasons…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Case v. Los Angeles Lumber Products Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
- United States v. Wong Kim ArkSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Keck v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Pagliero v. Wallace China Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1952
- Kraft Foods Company v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Clairol Incorporated v. The Gillette CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- Norwich Pharmacal Company v. Sterling Drug, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Rogers Imports, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.