Heyer v. Duplicator Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holmes
This is a bill in equity brought by the respondent against the petitioner alleging the infringement of a patent. The District Court dismissed the bill, but the Circuit Court of Appeals gave the respondent a decree, one Judge dissenting upon the main point. 284 Fed. 242. The respondent owns a patent for improvements in multiple copying machines, one element of which is a band of gelatine to which is transferred the print to be multiplied and which yields copies up to about a hundred. This band is attached to a spool or spindle which fits into the machine. Anyone may make and sell the gelatine…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Leeds & Catlin Company v. Victor Talking Machine Company (No. 2)Supreme Court of the United States · 1909
- Wilson v. SimpsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
- Duplicator Mfg. Co. v. HeyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1922
3Cited by53 opinions
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Carbice Corp. of America v. American Patents Development Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Leesona Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1979
- Beckman Instruments, Inc., and Leland C. Clark, Jr., Plaintiffs-Appellants-Cross v. Chemtronics, Inc. And J. Ryan Neville, Defendants-Appellees-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
- Beckman Instruments, Inc. v. Chemtronics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1970
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.