Legal Opinion
Ramirez & Feraud Chili Co. v. Las Palmas Food Company
District Court, S.D. California
Decided November 8, 1956No. 19355PublishedCited by 49 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
By this action plaintiff seeks an injunction restraining further alleged infringement and unfair competition in the use of plaintiff’s trade-mark and trade name “Las Palmas”; also threefold damages and other equitable relief.
The original jurisdiction of this court is invoked under the Trade-Mark Act of 1946 — the Lanham Act. 60 Stat. 427 (1946), 15 U.S.C.A. §§ 1051-1127; 28 U.S.C. § 1338(a). Pendent jurisdiction of related claims of unfair competition is invoked under 28 U.S.C. § 1338(b). Cf. Hurn v. Oursler, 1933, 289 U.S. .238, 240-243, 248, 53 S.Ct. 586, 77 L.Ed.…
2Cases cited88 opinions
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Land v. DollarSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Mansfield, Coldwater & Lake Michigan Railway Co. v. SwanSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- United States v. Aluminum Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Wells Fargo & Co. v. Wells Fargo Express Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- Walt Disney Productions v. The Air PiratesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Gerard A. Harrison and Harrison Ranch, Inc. v. Carey Prather and William PratherCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
- Mars Incorporated v. Kabushiki-Kaisha Nippon ConluxCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- American Rice, Inc. v. The Arkansas Rice Growers Cooperative Association, D/B/A Riceland FoodsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.