General Electric Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Per curiam
This patent suit concerning ser-
vomechanisms presents several separate issues. Trial Judge Colaianni has filed a thorough and careful report giving his rulings and finding the. relevant facts. Plaintiff has sought review of significant parts (but not of all) of the adverse aspects of the trial judge’s decision, and the defendant asks review of all the decision adverse to it. We have heard oral argument en banc and considered the briefs and record. Our conclusion is that the trial judge is correct on all points except his ruling that defendant’s overhaul of the 5"/38 single Mk 30 gun mounts at…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Aro Manufacturing Co. v. Convertible Top Replacement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Lincoln Engineering Co. v. Stewart-Warner Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- Envirotech Corporation v. Al George, Incorporated and Monosep, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Howard A. Fromson v. Advance Offset Plate, Inc., Graphcoat, Inc., News Publishing Company of Framingham, Newspapers of New England, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- Raytheon Company, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Roper Corporation, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
- McGill Incorporated v. John Zink Company, McGill Incorporated, Cross-Appellant v. John Zink Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Roche Products, Inc. v. Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.