Legal Opinion

Stevens v. Boyes Hot Springs Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1931No. Docket No. 7561PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.

Action to recover a balance alleged to be due upon a promissory note payable to plaintiffs and executed by defendant Boyes Plot Springs Company, a corporation. The note was dated July 6, 1922, and was in the sum of $6,800 and it provided for five payments in yearly installments of $1360 each, together with interest. In the complaint it is alleged that the note was duly and regularly executed by defendant corporation and, as consideration for it, plaintiffs transferred and delivered to the corporation 10,000 shares of its capital stock, and at the same time also delivered and surrendered to it…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lukens v. NyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Schulte v. Boulevard Gardens Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1913
  3. McKee v. Title Insurance Etc. Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Stewart v. Stewart Hotel Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
  5. Wagg v. TolerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Tiedje v. Aluminum Taper Milling Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Wood v. Imperial Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Mindenberg v. Carmel Film Productions, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Hansen v. California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  5. England v. ChristensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API