Legal Opinion

Wood v. Imperial Irrigation District

California Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1932No. Docket No. L.A. 12870PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeawell, J.

This appeal comes to us upon an agreed statement of facts. The Imperial Irrigation District, the powers of which were considered by this court under the act by which it was created and governed in the ease of Crawford v. Imperial Irr. Dist., 200 Cal. 318 [253 Pac. 726], had on deposit in the name of its treasurer with the Farmers and Merchants Bank of Imperial on the nineteenth day of June, 1925, in its checking account, the sum of $6,993.61. On that day said district deposited with said bank an additional sum of $40,000, the bank issuing to said district four of its certificates of deposit…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Tarpey v. McClureCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. County of Divide v. BairdNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Commercial Banking & Trust Co. v. Citizens Trust & Guaranty Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Colby v. Title Insurance & Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1911
  5. Turlock Irrigation Dist. v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Nelson v. Wiersema State BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Fewel & Dawes, Inc. v. PrattCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Powers Farms, Inc. v. Consolidated Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Sheldon v. Grand River Dam AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Hunter v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API