England v. Christensen
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtSullivan, P. J.
We hold in this case that the purchase by the corporation out of stated capital of the shares issued by it was not made to compromise a controversy between said corporation on the one hand and the selling shareholders on the other and was therefore unauthorized and unlawful. As we explain, the trial court erroneously interpreted the statutes authorizing such a purchase and imposing liability upon selling shareholders for their violation. While we deem it unnecessary to order a new trial, our holdings on the fundamental issue of the legality of the transaction under scrutiny and on the related…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Crawford v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1935
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Select Base Materials, Inc. v. Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
- Primm v. PrimmCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Revco D.S., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1990
- Duffy v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Boam v. Trident Financial Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1992
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- In Re Belmetals Mfg. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1969
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.