Legal Opinion

Schulte v. Boulevard Gardens Land Co.

California Supreme Court

Decided January 9, 1913No. S.F. No. 5833PublishedCited by 44 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtSloss, J.

The plaintiff appeals from a judgment in favor of defendant, entered upon an order sustaining, without leave to amend, a demurrer to the plaintiff’s first amended complaint.

The complaint contains eighteen counts, but, by stipulation of the parties, only the first, the second, the third, the tenth, the eleventh, and the twelfth counts are included in the transcript, the omitted counts being, so far as concerns the legal questions here involved, precisely similar to one or another of those before us.

The first count, with amendments subsequently made thereto, alleges that on April 3, 1908, the…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Sturm v. BokerSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  2. Martin v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Burne v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Kohl v. LilienthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Porter v. Plymouth Gold Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Hulen v. StuartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Armstrong v. Union Trust & Savings BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1918
  4. Grace Securities Corp. v. RobertsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1932
  5. Kaplan v. Reid Bros., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1930

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API