Legal Opinion

Wagg v. Toler

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1926No. Docket No. 3179PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

Action by plaintiff to recover from the defendants the sum of $2,500 on a certain promissory note executed and delivered by the defendant Toler to the defendant Leach-Biltwell Motor Car Company, a corporation, and by the corporation assigned and transferred to the plaintiff. Defendants had judgment and the plaintiff appeals.

The grounds urged by appellant for reversal upon this appeal necessary to be considered herein are: First, that the court erred in holding that the transfer of the note sued upon to the plaintiff by the defendant corporation was void ab initio; second, that the evidence…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Bement v. National Harrow Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Poultry Producers of Southern California, Inc. v. BarlowCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Martin v. ZellerbachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  4. Santa Clara Valley Mill and Lumber Co. v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Johnson v. WilliamsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Hansen v. California BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. McDermott v. Bear Film Co.California Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Stevens v. Boyes Hot Springs Co.California Court of Appeal · 1931
  4. Sarmento v. Bay City Land & Cattle Co.California Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Cucinella v. Weston Biscuit Co.California Supreme Court · 1954

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API