Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 13, 1936No. Crim. 1520PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPlummer, J.

On the 27th day of May, 1936, the district attorney of the county of Lake filed an information in which he accused the defendant of a felony, to wit, child stealing, based on section 278 of the Penal Code. The information alleges that the defendant, on or about the 10th day of May, 1936, in the county of Lake, state of California, did then and there wilfully, unlawfully and maliciously take away a minor child, to wit, Mary Spiers, then and there of the age of thirteen years, with the intent then and there to retain and conceal such child from J. C. Anton who was then and there the probation…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Pico v. CohnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hahn v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  3. People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  4. People v. TallmadgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In Re HoltCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. People v. WisecarverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  2. Guardianship of HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. People v. HyattCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
  4. People v. McGinnisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  5. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API