People v. Tallmadge
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Tulare County, and from an order denying a new trial. Wheaton A. Gkay, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcFarland, J.
The appellant was charged with the larceny of a number of hogs, the property of one Bertch, and was convicted of grand larceny. He moved for a new trial, and the motion was denied; and from the judgment and the order denying a new trial he appealed.
The only point pressed by appellant is that the court erred in not granting a new trial upon the ground of newly discovered evidence. One Harry Lynde was a principal witness against the appellant, and was, according to his testimony, an accomplice. He testified that, on or about the 15th of November, at 9 or 10 o’clock at night, he, in company with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- People v. SuttonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
- People v. FreemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Mann v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1876
3Cited by36 opinions
- Larrison v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
- People v. . ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- State v. CompianoSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- People v. LeeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.