Legal Opinion
People v. Hyatt
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 8, 1971No. Crim. 4406PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COUGHLIN, Acting P. J.
Defendant was charged with the offense of child stealing, a violation of Penal Code section 278; was found guilty by a jury’s verdict; was granted probation; and appeals.
Defendant and his wife were parties to a divorce action in which, by an order pendente lite, the minor children of the parties, Troy and Deborah, were placed in the custody of the wife, their mother, with a right of visitation by the defendant on Saturday of each week. Defendant admitted having knowledge of this order. At the trial of the case on May 18, 1965, at which all parties were present,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. PhillipsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. CooglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Stickel v. San Diego Electric Railway Co.California Supreme Court · 1948
- Rosefield v. RosefieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- People v. WisecarverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- State v. SheldonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- People v. CervantesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- LaFleur v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.