Legal Opinion

People v. Lee

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 1935No. Crim. 183PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

The defendant was accused in two separate informations with having violated the state Narcotic Act. In one information he was charged with having sold a preparation of opium and in the other he was accused of having sold a preparation of cocaine. The defendant entered a plea of not guilty to both accusations. On the date appointed for the trial it was stipulated between counsel for the defendant and the district attorney that the two actions should be consolidated for trial. Upon the conclusion of the trial before a jury selected for the purpose verdicts were returned convicting defendant of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. . ShilitanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  2. People v. TallmadgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. People v. MakovskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
  4. People v. HarrisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
  5. People v. RuckerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
  3. People v. FrankfortCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. People v. BraddockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  5. Charles T. Henderson, Jr., George Truitt Robbins and John B. Dees v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1956

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API