Legal Opinion
People v. Wisecarver
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 7, 1944No. Crim. 3845PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, P. J.
The question posed by this appeal is whether the defendant was held without probable cause for the offense of child stealing. Having been committed by the Justice’s Court of Compton Township June 1, 1944, she was duly accused by the district attorney under information filed in the superior court. Pursuant to motion under section 995, Penal Code, the accusation was dismissed on the ground that the transcript of the evidence taken before the justice of the peace did not contain evidence or inferences that defendant had violated the code section under which she was accused.
The statute which…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- United States v. BittySupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- In re McCartyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
- People v. StollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- United States v. HeinzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- People v. ValentiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- In Re HallinanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
- Lawrence D. Coleman v. The Honorable Arthur L. Burnett, United States Magistrate for the District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1973
- Smith v. TuckerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
- Davis v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.