Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Smith

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 13, 2008No. 27 September Term, 2007PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDale R. Cathell, Judge

(Retired, Specially Assigned).

On August 20, 2007, the Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland, petitioner, by Melvin Hirshman, Bar Counsel, and Dolores O. Ridgell, Assistant Bar Counsel, filed a petition for disciplinary action 1 against Patrick J. Smith, respondent, for multiple violations of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (MRPC). The petition alleged that respondent, based upon his actions related to his representation of Joshua Teague, had violated MRPC 3.4 and 8.4(a)-(d). 2

Pursuant to Md. Rule 16-752(a) this Court assigned the matter to Judge Ronald B. Rubin of the Circuit…

2Cases cited52 opinions

  1. In Re RuffaloSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Berkey v. DeliaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AwuahCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JosephCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FaderCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MarcalusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API