Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Fader

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided May 6, 2013No. Misc. Docket AG No. 12PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBattaglia, J.

Joel Jay Fader, Respondent, was admitted to the Bar of this Court on June 1, 1989. On April 3, 2012, the Attorney Grievance Commission, acting through Bar Counsel (“Bar Counsel”), pursuant to Maryland Rule lO-TSUa),1 filed a “Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action” against Fader. The *398principal complaint, out of two in Bar Counsel’s petition, arose from an administrative case between one of Fader’s clients and the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (“DHMH”), and was filed by an employee of DHMH, Lauren Jones. The complaint alleged that a request Fader had filed with the…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission of Maryland v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GallagherCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MixterCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DavyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MunginCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API