Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Palmer

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided November 30, 2010No. Misc. Docket AG No. 49, September Term, 2009PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHarrell, J.

The Attorney Grievance Commission (“Petitioner”), acting through Bar Counsel, filed a Petition for Disciplinary or Remedial Action against Christopher A. Palmer (“Respondent”), charging him with professional misconduct in violating various provisions of the Maryland Rules of Professional Conduct (“MRPC”), the Maryland Rules, and the Business Occupations & Professions Article of the Maryland Code. Specifically, Petitioner charged that Respondent violated the following Rules of Professional Conduct: 1.1 (competence);1 1.15(a), (c) (safekeeping property);2 8.4(b), (c), (d);3 Maryland *190Rule 16-609…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. VanderlindeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  2. Maryland State Bar Ass'n v. AgnewCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GuidaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2006
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. ZuckermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. CoppolaCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. AgbajeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. Van NelsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2012
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. LaraCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API