Legal Opinion
Terzian v. Superior Court
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 6, 1970No. Docket Nos. 27821, 27904PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SIMS, J.
By these proceedings petitioner as the Director of the Department of Social Welfare of the County of Alameda seeks to avoid disclosure of information and records concerning a minor who was committed to the department to arrange adoptive placement or to make a suitable plan (Civ. Code, § 226c) after she had been declared free from parental control and custody (see Civ. Code, §§ 232-239), and who is also the subject of proceedings in which the real party in interest seeks to be appointed her guardian. In Civil 27821 petitioner seeks a writ of mandate 1 to set aside an order…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- People v. ArandaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- In Re WaltreusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Oceanside Union School District v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Chronicle Publishing Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- City & County of San Francisco v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Willis McGhee Carol McGhee David Rudh Chaweean Rudh v. Arabian American Oil Company, D/B/A Aramco, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Uribe v. HowieCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- McKillop v. Regents of the University of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1975
- Henry Mayo Newhall Memorial Hospital v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Matter of Adoption of SpinksCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.