Legal Opinion

City & County of San Francisco v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1951No. S. F. 18442; S. F. 18443PublishedCited by 46 opinions

Milton Marks and Milton Marks, Jr., for Respondents.

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

The petitioners seek a writ prohibiting the enforcement of an order of the respondent superior court for the inspection of documents and data claimed to be in the records of official proceedings conducted by the Civil Service Commission of the City and County of San Francisco. An alternative writ was issued.

In September, 1949, several hundred employees of the city and county, representing as well other employees similarly *158situated, filed in the superior court a petition for the writ of mandate naming as respondents the city and county of San Francisco, its board of supervisors, and its civil…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Rescue Army v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Fortenbury v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  5. City & County of San Francisco v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. In Re OlsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
  2. Mooney v. PickettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Youmans v. OwensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  4. State Ex Rel. Newsome v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1977
  5. MacEwan v. HOLMOregon Supreme Court · 1961

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API