Legal Opinion
Willis McGhee Carol McGhee David Rudh Chaweean Rudh v. Arabian American Oil Company, D/B/A Aramco, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 28, 1989No. 86-2798PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Willis McGhee and David Rudh and their spouses brought this diversity action against their former employer, the Arabian American Oil Company (Aramco), for wrongful termination of their employment contracts and for defamation, intentional infliction of emotional distress, fraud, and conversion. McGhee and Rudh were terminated by Aramco and expelled from Saudi Arabia for renting videotapes to fellow employees from their homes in Aramco’s compounds, activity that Aramco viewed as violating Saudi restrictions on commercial enterprises in the compounds.
On the contract…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Banco Nacional De Cuba v. SabbatinoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc., William Inglis & Sons Baking Co. v. Itt Continental Baking Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Hurtado v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Reich v. PurcellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- Lien Huynh v. Chase Manhattan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Air-Sea Forwarders, Inc. v. Air Asia Company, Ltd., and E-Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Luis Mujica v. Airscan Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Kremen v. CohenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Coufal Abogados Eric Coufal v. At&t, Inc. Lucent Technologies Inc.,defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.