Legal Opinion

Aetna Finance Co. v. Darwin

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided November 20, 1984No. 6453-7-IIPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReed, J.

Ruth Ragsdale (formerly and herein referred to as Ruth Darwin) appeals from a judgment of $42,439.56 in favor of Aetna Finance Co. (Aetna). Aetna loaned $51,000 to Jerald and Ruth Darwin on December 4, 1979. The Darwins requested a loan to purchase a commercial truck and trailer costing $39,500. At the time of the loan transaction, RCW 19.52.020 limited the interest rate on loans to 12 percent. Loan transactions that exceed $50,000 and are made exclusively for commercial or business pur poses were exempted. RCW 19.52.080. Aetna wished to limit its loans to those that would qualify for the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Seattle School District No. 1 v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Smith v. ShannonWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Liebergesell v. EvansWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Hafer v. SpaethWashington Supreme Court · 1945
  5. Painting & Decorating Contractors of America, Inc. v. Ellensburg School DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Thweatt v. HommelCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
  2. Pacesetter Real Estate, Inc. v. FasulesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
  3. Brown v. GigerWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Demopolis v. GalvinCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1990
  5. Cuevas v. MontoyaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1987

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API