Legal Opinion

Celian v. Coast Finance Corp.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 6, 1937No. 26295. Department OnePublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

September 12, 1931, the plaintiffs executed to H. S. Norman a promissory note and chattel mortgage. September 14th, Norman endorsed' the note “with recourse,” and assigned the chattel mortgage to defendant. In May, 1935, defendant instituted foreclosure proceedings by notice and sale. Plaintiffs caused the proceedings to be transferred to the superior court.

Plaintiffs alleged that Norman was merely the agent of defendant in making the loan which Was evidenced' by the note and secured by the chattel mortgage, and that the transaction was tainted with usury. Defendant denied these charges, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Motor Contract Co. v. Van Der VolgenWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  2. State v. DaviesWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Sheffield Co. v. R. Hoe & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Richardson v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Clausing v. Virginia Lee Homes, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Auve v. FagnantWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Dunbabin v. BrandenfelsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977
  4. Weitzman v. BergstromWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Weitzman v. BergstromWashington Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API