Legal Opinion

Security Insurance Company of Hartford v. Houser

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 28, 1976No. C-650PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Pringle

This is a garnishment proceeding in which the petitioner, Security Insurance, seeks review of a court of appeals decision, Houser v. Eckhardt, 35 Colo. App. 155, 532 P.2d 54 (1974), concerning the extent of the petitioner’s obligation to pay interest on a judgment against its insured.

The respondent, W. L. Houser, brought a suit for damages resulting from personal injuries sustained in an automobile accident. At the time of the accident the defendant was protected by a policy of insurance issued by the petitioner. After a jury trial, the respondent was awarded a verdict in the amount of…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. River Valley Cartage Co. v. Hawkeye-Security InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
  2. McPhee v. American Motorists InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973
  3. York Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Groussman Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1968
  4. Hafer v. SchauerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Home Indemnity Company v. MuncyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1969

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Allstate Insurance Co. v. StarkeSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
  3. Simon v. Shelter General Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Paros Properties LLC v. Colorado Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  5. Moncrief v. HarveyWyoming Supreme Court · 1991

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API