Legal Opinion
Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. Petersen
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided June 27, 1983No. Civ. A. 82-A-1464PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
ARRAJ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Federal Deposit Insurance Company (FDIC) initiated this action to enforce certain guaranty contracts. Jurisdiction is founded on 28 U.S.C. § 1345 and 12 U.S.C. § 1819 Fourth. The defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings or in the alternative for summary judgment. Before this motion came to be heard, the parties reached a stipulation concerning the essential facts of the case, leaving only legal issues unresolved. The hearing on the motion was therefore consolidated with trial on the merits. The only issues to be considered are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Juan Santoni, Jr. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BirdDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981
- Kenneth M. Henson, Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross v. Columbus Bank and Trust Company, Defendant-Appellee-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- United States v. CardinalDistrict Court, D. Vermont · 1978
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. DunnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. Barnett, United States of America v. Mark Rollinson, Edmund S. BarnettCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. BurdetteDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1988
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. PearsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. PaulDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.