Legal Opinion

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, in Its Corporate Capacity, Plaintiff v. James H. Petersen, Henry Heidtbrink, and Jerry R. Dunn

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 6, 1985No. 83-2152PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judge.

This is an action by plaintiff-appellant, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), against defendants-appellees Petersen, Heidtbrink, and Dunn to enforce guaranty contracts entered into by defendants. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1345 and 12 U.S.C. § 1819, Fourth. The district court, 565 F.Supp. 1007, held that the FDIC’s claims were barred by the federal statute of limitations, 28 U.S.C. § 2415(a). FDIC appeals. We affirm.

The case was submitted on a stipulation of facts. R. 60-65. On February 1, 1975, Meridian Properties, Inc. (Meridian) signed a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. D'Oench, Duhme & Co. v. Federal Deposit InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  2. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Juan Santoni, Jr. v. Federal Deposit Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
  4. Hayim Kalmich v. Karl BrunoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  5. Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. BirdDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1981

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Angela M. Phelps v. John D. McClellanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
  2. Gluck v. Unisys Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. People v. WiedemerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  4. John H. Held v. Manufacturers Hanover Leasing CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
  5. Hambrecht & Quist Venture Partners v. American Medical International, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1995

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API