Legal Opinion
United States v. Cardinal
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided June 23, 1978No. Civ. A. 76-240PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COFFRIN, District Judge.
The Government brings this action to recover on a promissory note executed by the defendant and one Joyce Cardinal, now deceased. Defendant filed original and amended answers with counterclaims and affirmative defenses, one of which alleged that the Government’s action is time barred. The Government responded with a motion to dismiss and to strike portions of defendant’s answer. On November 10,1977 a hearing was held on plaintiff’s motions at which both parties were represented by counsel. During the hearing it became evident that neither party was certain of the date…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Reading Co. v. KoonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 75,305 United States of America v. Dos Cabezas Corp., an Arizona Corporation State of Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Federal Sav. and Loan Ins. Corp. v. WilliamsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1984
- Federal Deposit Ins. Corp. v. HowseDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1990
- United States Ex Rel. Small Business Administration v. MorrisDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1981
- Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Former Officers And Directors Of Metropolitan BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.