Legal Opinion

Curran v. Progressive Northwestern Insurance Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 2001No. S-9311, S-9355PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BRYNER, Justice.

I, INTRODUCTION

This case involves insurance claims arising from two vehicular accidents. Sheila Curran was injured in a single-vehicle accident. After declining to bring a claim against the driver or his liability insurer, she made claims under both the driver's and her own underinsured motorist (UIM) policies. Both underinsurers denied her claims, asserting that she had failed to exhaust the underlying liability policy limits as required by statute and the UIM policies. Mark Barnhill was injured in a two-car collision. Barnhill eventually settled with the tortfeasor's…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  2. Schmidt v. ClothierSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Longworth v. Van HoutenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1988
  4. State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
  5. State Automobile Mutual Insurance v. YoulerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1990

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. McDonnell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance CompanyAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Oels v. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'nAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State, Department of Commerce, Community & Economic Development, Division of Insurance v. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2011
  4. Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. AdkinsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API