Legal Opinion
Oels v. Anchorage Police Department Employees Ass'n
Alaska Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 2012No. S-13949PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
STOWERS, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Anchorage Municipal Code (AMC) section 03.30.068(A)(4) permits municipal employees to retire and be rehired, thereby accessing accumulated retirement benefits and resuming employment under a different retirement program with the Municipality of Anchorage (MOA).
Tom Oels has been a sergeant with the Anchorage Police Department (APD) since 2002. In 2005, Oels stated his intent to retire and be rehired while retaining the rank of sergeant. Oels was told that under AMC 03.30.068(A)(d) he could retire, but could only be rehired as an entry-level patrol…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. O'Neill Investigations, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. AlexAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Peninsula Marketing Ass'n v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- State v. FyfeAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- City of Valdez v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2016
- Estate of Kim Ex Rel. Alexander v. CoxeAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Titus v. State, Dept. of Administration, Division of Motor VehiclesAlaska Supreme Court · 2013
- Alaska Association of Naturopathic Physicians v. State, Division of Corporations, Business & Professional LicensingAlaska Supreme Court · 2018
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.