Legal Opinion

Solomon v. Connecticut Medical Examining Board

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided November 9, 2004No. AC 24782PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

DRANGINIS, J.

The pro se plaintiff, Abraham Solomon, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his appeal from the decision of the defendant, the Connecticut medical examining board. On appeal, the plaintiff raises sixteen claims as to why it was improper for the court to affirm the defendant’s decision to revoke his license to practice medicine in this state. The claims may be distilled into two categories: (1) the plaintiff was denied due process of law and (2) there was insubstantial evidence to support the defendant’s decision. We disagree with the plaintiffs claims…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. State v. DaySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. PSE Consulting, Inc. v. MercedeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
  4. Jutkowitz v. Department of Health ServicesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
  5. Levinson v. Connecticut Board of Chiropractic ExaminersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of New Haven v. BonnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
  2. Rudder v. MAMANASCO LAKE PARK ASS'N, INC.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. Mercer v. CosleyConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  4. Papic v. BurkeConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
  5. Bailey v. LanouConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API