Legal Opinion
Mercer v. Cosley
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 16, 2008No. AC 28960PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
FLYNN, C. J.
The pro se plaintiff, Eugene P. Mercer, appeals from the summary judgment rendered by the trial court in favor of the defendants, Katishia Cosley, Burchell Henry, Paul Lewis and Jerry Martin and their employer, Tribune Television Company, also known as WTIC FOX-61 (collectively FOX-61), and Thomas M. O’Brien and his employer, Outlet Broadcasting, Inc., doing business as WVIT NBC-30 (collectively NBC-30). On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court improperly (1) failed to recuse itself, sua sponte, on the basis of judicial bias and (2) rendered summary judgment in favor…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Strada v. Connecticut Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Liljedahl Bros. v. GrigsbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Goodrich v. Waterbury Republican-American, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
- Doe v. Yale UniversitySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
- Tedesco v. City of StamfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Skakel v. GraceDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Peatie v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- In Energy Solutions, Inc. v. Realgy, LLCConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Shah v. Administrator, Unemployment Compensation ActConnecticut Appellate Court · 2009
- Indiaweekly. Com, LLC v. Nehaflix. Com, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.