Legal Opinion
City of New Haven v. Bonner
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 18, 2005No. SC 17142PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BORDEN, J.
The plaintiff, the city of New Haven, appeals1 from the trial court’s judgment of foreclosure *491by sale of the plaintiffs municipal tax liens against the property of the named defendant, Janice M. Bonner.2 The plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly disallowed a collection agency fee as part of the tax debt owed to it by the defendant pursuant to General Statutes § 12-166.3 We agree with the plaintiff and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment of the trial court in part.
The record reveals the following facts and procedural background. For the tax years 1996 through…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. CourchesneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- State v. LinaresSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Thomas v. City of West HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Commission on Human Rights & Opportunities v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- River Bend Associates, Inc. v. Conservation & Inland Wetlands CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Perez-Dickson v. City of BridgeportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2012
- Connecticut Insurance Guaranty Ass'n v. FontaineSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Orcutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Vine v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Miller's Pond Co., LLC v. City of New LondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.