Legal Opinion
PSE Consulting, Inc. v. Mercede
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided January 13, 2004No. SC 16839PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KATZ, J.
This appeal concerns the rights of a surety, pursuant to an indemnity agreement, to indemnification for payments made in settling a claim against a surety bond. The sole parties in this appeal are National Fire Insurance Company of Hartford (National) and FYank Mercede and Sons, Inc. (Mercede), the two defendants in the underlying action.1 National, a commercial surety company, appeals2 from the judgment of the trial court, rendered after a jury trial, in favor of Mercede on National’s cross complaint seeking indemnification and on Mercede’s counter cross complaint seeking…
2Cases cited69 opinions
- Associated Indemnity Corp. v. CAT Contracting, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1998
- Home Insurance v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
- Transamerica Ins. Co. v. AvenellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
- Habetz v. CondonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Schoonmaker v. Lawrence Brunoli, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Glazer v. Dress Barn, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2005
- Viera v. CohenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
- Updike, Kelly & Spellacy, P.C. v. BeckettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
- Wiseman v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
- State v. SwintonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.