McCormick v. Kistler
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Saginaw; Kendrick, J. Replevin by Edwin W. McCormick against Henry Kistler for property seized on execution. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtOstrander, J.
The action is replevin. The court directed a verdict for the defendant, and in doing so stated that the facts, which are reviewed, are practically undisputed.
Plaintiff assigns errors upon three statements made by the court in the explanatory charge to the jury, as follows:
“The parties to the bill of sale in this case took no steps to comply with the statute in so far as this defendant’s interest is concerned (nor as against the persons who caused the levy, Hammond, Standish & Co.); to this defendant it is absolutely as though the attempted transfer had not been made. The bill of sale in no…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- People's Savings Bank v. Van AllsburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Bowen v. QuigleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Cullen v. HarrisMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- Anderson v. OdellMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Stewart v. WeltonMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Albright v. StockhillMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Congress Candy Co. v. Farmer SellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
- Missos v. SpyrosWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
- Saunders v. GraffSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918