Legal Opinion

Bowen v. Quigley

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1911No. Docket No. 24PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. . . Garnishment proceedings by William F. Bowen against Robert M. Quigley in justice’s court. Defendant appealed to the circuit court, from a judgment against him. A judgment for defendant on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by plaintiff on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

The plaintiff sued George Glazier in justice’s court, and garnished the defendant, Quigley. A judgment for $390.11 damages and $2 costs passed against Glazier. Later a judgment for a like amount was rendered against the defendant. The defendant appealed to the circuit court, where the judgment resulted in his *338favor. The plaintiff brings the case to this court for review.

The basis of the garnishee suit was the purchase by defendant of certain personal property from the principal defendant, Glazier. Glazier had been a retail coal dealer, and had become indebted to plaintiff for coal. While so…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bartlett v. HavilandMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. People's Savings Bank v. Van AllsburgMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Mott v. ReevesNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Item Co. v. National Dyers & Cleaners, Ltd.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
  4. McPartin v. ClarksonMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Patmos v. Grand Rapids Dairy Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1928

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API