Legal Opinion

People's Savings Bank v. Van Allsburg

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 8, 1911No. Docket No. 13PublishedCited by 24 opinions

Error to Kent; Perkins, J. Garnishment proceedings by the People’s Savings Bank against Arie Van Allsburg and Louis Van Allsburg. A judgment for plaintiff on a verdict directed by the court is reviewed by defendants on writ of error.

1Opinion of the CourtBird, J.

After obtaining a judgment in the Kent circuit court against Edward Howell, the plaintiff garnished the defendants, who were purchasers of Howell’s undertaking business, stock, and appliances. The defendants disclosed that they had no money or property in their possession belonging to Howell, and that they were not indebted to him. The plaintiff was not content with this disclosure, and instituted this suit under the statute to test the truth of the disclosure. After a hearing on the merits, the trial court directed a verdict for the plaintiff *525in the sum of $515.89; the same being in full…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Bowen v. QuigleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Wilkinson-Beane, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
  2. Mott v. ReevesNew York Supreme Court · 1925
  3. Burnett v. TrimmellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1918
  4. Mahoney-Jones Co. v. Sams Bros.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Hartwig v. RushingOregon Supreme Court · 1919

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API