Legal Opinion

West Pinal Family Health Center, Inc. v. McBryde

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 14, 1989No. 2 CA-SA 89-0099PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LACAGNINA, Acting Presiding Judge.

Petitioner seeks special action relief from the trial court’s granting the motion of real parties in interest (hereinafter “Holmes”) to compel and the denial of petitioner’s motions in limine. Because petitioner has no equally plain, speedy and adequate remedy by appeal and because the trial court’s rulings constitute an abuse of the court’s discretion, we accept jurisdiction and grant relief. Ariz.R.P.Spec. Action 1 and 3, 17B A.R.S.

ISSUES

The issues presented by this special action are as follows:

1. Does the doctrine of mitigation of damages require…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  2. Brown v. Superior Court in & for Maricopa Cy.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Shreeve v. GreerArizona Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Barnes v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. County of La Paz v. Yakima Compost Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
  2. Czarnecki v. Volkswagen of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  3. Conant v. WhitneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. Farris v. Advantage Capital Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Shuck v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API