Legal Opinion
Barnes v. Lopez
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided January 14, 1976No. 2 CA-CIV 1795PublishedCited by 37 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KRUCKER, Judge.
Appellants, hereinafter referred to as Barnes and Soleng, were defendants in a suit instituted by appellees, hereinafter referred to as Lopez, for damages for fraud arising out of a real estate transaction. The case was tried to a jury, which returned a verdict in favor of Lopez against Soleng and Barnes in the amount of $16,600.00. The cross-claims of each de fendant against the other were tried to the court and judgment was rendered in favor of Soleng against Barnes in the amount of $16,600, plus attorneys’ fees in the sum of $3,000.00. (The fees incurred in defending…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Carrel v. LuxArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Regus v. SchartkoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
- Reese v. CraditCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
- Powell v. BradyColorado Court of Appeals · 1972
- Light v. Chandler Improvement Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1928
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Field v. MansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Bevins v. BallardAlaska Supreme Court · 1982
- Formento v. Encanto Business ParkCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1987
- Cecil Lawter Real Estate School, Inc. v. Town & Country Shopping Center Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Circle K Corp. v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.