Legal Opinion
Shuck v. Texaco Refining & Marketing, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 21, 1994No. 1 CA-CV 92-0149PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NOYES, Judge.
Darlene and Troy Shuck appeal from a directed verdict granted to Texaco Refining and Marketing, Inc. in this slip-and-fall case. We conclude that the trial court erred in granting the directed verdict. We also conclude that the trial court abused its discretion by granting a motion in limine to preclude Troy Shuck from testifying about statements allegedly made to him by an unidentified Texaco employee.
Facts and Procedural History
On April 12, 1991, the Shucks filed a complaint alleging that Texaco was liable for injuries Darlene Shuck suffered when she slipped and fell at…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Kevin Pappas v. Middle Earth Condominium Association Castle Rock Management CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Selby v. SavardArizona Supreme Court · 1982
- Oki America, Inc. v. Microtech International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Chiara v. Fry's Food Stores of Arizona, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1987
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- Wallace v. Casa Grande Union High School District No. 82Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Diaz v. Magma Copper Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
- Little v. All Phoenix South Community Mental Health Center, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
- Ryan v. San Francisco Peaks Trucking Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.