Legal Opinion

Conant v. Whitney

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 22, 1997No. 1 CA-CV 96-0018PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NOYES, Judge.

A black bull owned by Defendant Whitney was in the road near Saguaro Lake one night and caused a two-motorcycle crash in which Plaintiffs John and Ann Conant' were injured. The Conants’ lawsuit alleged that Whitney was negligent, in part, because the bull had escaped from a pasture in which Whitney was not allowed to have bulls. Whitney leased this pasture from the Forest Service and his grazing permit specified that it was to be a “no bulls” pasture. Prior to trial, Whitney stipulated that the grazing permit documents could be admitted into evidence. During jury…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Markowitz v. Arizona Parks BoardArizona Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Trantor v. FredriksonArizona Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Carrow Co. v. LusbyArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  4. Allianz Insurance v. GagnonNevada Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Watson Construction Co. v. Amfac Mortgage Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Yauch v. Southern Pacific Transportation Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Larsen v. DeckerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Wersch v. Radnor/LandgrantCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  4. guardianship/conservatorship of Van SickleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Ader v. Estate of FelgerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API