Legal Opinion

Farris v. Advantage Capital Corp.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 2007No. CV-07-0114-CQPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RYAN, Justice.

¶ 1 Arizona law permits a party to a legal “action affecting title to real property” to file a lis pendens with the county recorder. Ariz.Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 12-1191(A) (2003 & Supp.2006). The filing provides notice to interested persons that the property is subject to litigation.

¶2 The United States District Court for the District of Arizona has asked us whether a creditor’s action under Arizona’s version of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“UFTA”), A.R.S. §§ 44-1001 to -1010 (2003), to void a debtor’s allegedly fraudulent transfer of real property and thus make…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Kirkeby v. Superior Court of Orange CountyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Hullett v. CousinArizona Supreme Court · 2003
  3. National City Bank, Indiana v. ShortridgeIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Parrot v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 2006
  5. West Pinal Family Health Center, Inc. v. McBrydeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. West v. Club at Spanish Peaks, L.L.C.Montana Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Santa Fe Ridge Homeowners' Ass'n v. BartschiCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  3. Arizona Chamber of Commerce & Industry v. KileyArizona Supreme Court · 2017
  4. In Re FarnsworthUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Arizona · 2008
  5. Fagerlie v. MARKHAM CONTRACTING CO., INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API