Legal Opinion

Oneglia v. Oneglia

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided April 26, 1988No. 5629PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The plaintiff appeals from the decision of the trial court denying her motion to open the judgment previously rendered in a dissolution action.

The plaintiff claims the trial court erred (1) in prohibiting her from calling the defendant to the witness stand during the hearing on the motion to open, and (2) in prohibiting her from obtaining discovery of the defendant’s assets in order to determine whether the *268defendant had fraudulently misrepresented his financial position. We find no error.

The following facts are not in dispute. A final judgment dissolving the marriage of the parties was…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Leo v. LeoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
  2. Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Hebrew University Assn. v. NyeConnecticut Superior Court · 1966
  4. Rose v. RoseConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Voloshin v. VoloshinConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
  2. Lawler v. LawlerConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988
  3. Burns v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
  4. Vandal v. VandalConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Misinonile v. MisinonileConnecticut Appellate Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API