Legal Opinion

Vandal v. Vandal

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 8, 1993No. 11474PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFoti, J.

The defendant appeals challenging the financial awards made by the trial court in a marital dissolution action.1 The defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) awarded periodic alimony that could not be modified even upon the plaintiffs cohabitation or remarriage, (2) found the defendant’s earning capacity, and (3) awarded attorney’s fees. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are pertinent to this appeal. The parties were married on August 15,1971, in Norwich. There are two minor children issue of the marriage, Kathryn, born December 30, 1976, and Paul, Jr.,…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Gallo v. GalloSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  3. Anderson v. AndersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
  4. Venuti v. VenutiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Cummock v. CummockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Amodio v. AmodioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
  2. Rummel v. RummelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  3. Bauerle v. BauerleNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Wolf v. WolfConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
  5. Burns v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API