Legal Opinion

Lawler v. Lawler

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 13, 1988No. 5702PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNorcott, J.

The plaintiff appeals, challenging the financial orders rendered by the trial court incident to the judgment dissolving his marriage to the defendant. He claims that the trial court erred (1) in providing for automatic increases in periodic alimony payments reflecting cost-of-living increases without requiring a showing of a change in circumstances, (2) in concluding that the plaintiff had access to certain business *194income and in rendering orders based on that determination, (3) in making periodic alimony payments non-modifiable until the defendant reaches the age of sixty-two, (4) in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kakalik v. BernardoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  2. Rubin v. RubinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
  3. Cummock v. CummockSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
  4. Mihalyak v. MihalyakConnecticut Appellate Court · 1987
  5. Oneglia v. OnegliaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Chaker v. ChakerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1990
  2. Graham v. GrahamConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
  3. Lawler v. LawlerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  4. Rummel v. RummelConnecticut Appellate Court · 1993
  5. Burns v. BurnsConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API